ThomasDWeiss
09-28-2005, 22:30
A test track was used to test FPS performance -
BENCHMARK TEST web page (http://www.lockonfiles.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=43&mode=&order=0&thold=0)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/thomasdw/LOCKON%20FC/BENCHMARKTESTLOCKON1.jpg
FRAPS 2.5 was used to benchmark this 120 second track thats sees an A-10 diving thru clouds(set to 10 with thunderstorms) to bomb a building.
I have a couple of benchmarks to run, hopefully this weekend.
One conclusion: Lock On FC is FPS optimized, what can be done, it to try to improve the medium settings so that they can approach higher settings with a better FPS average.
I already posted a better FPS tweak for 1.1 - with a smoother FPS curve.
BENCHMARK TEST web page (http://www.lockonfiles.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=43&mode=&order=0&thold=0)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/thomasdw/LOCKON%20FC/BENCHMARKTESTLOCKON1.jpg
FRAPS 2.5 was used to benchmark this 120 second track thats sees an A-10 diving thru clouds(set to 10 with thunderstorms) to bomb a building.
I have a couple of benchmarks to run, hopefully this weekend.
One conclusion: Lock On FC is FPS optimized, what can be done, it to try to improve the medium settings so that they can approach higher settings with a better FPS average.
I already posted a better FPS tweak for 1.1 - with a smoother FPS curve.